penfold_x: (beetee adorbs)
I bought a ridiculously adorable shirt at Shore Leave 37:

Save the Galaxy
penfold_x: (district 3)
no title
The 'Tarr Family' actors are a hilarious crew. (Really didn't expect this many references to nudity in the 'family' panel.)
penfold_x: (district 3)
David Nykl introduced himself to the entire audience one by one.
no title
"I love being beaten up..."
penfold_x: (Default)
I can't explain it, but I really love hearing about the little details of characters' lives. I'd love to read about your favorite characters' typical day. What does their bedroom look like? Do they eat breakfast? Work out? Have a chore routine?

For THG, if really like Divergence AU, or any other post-MJ happyworld. What is Finnick and Annie's home like? Does Haymitch secretly love his geese?

*lonely otter look*

*paws at your fic/meta pocket*
penfold_x: (district 3)
This question is closely related to the geography of Panem, but unfortunately, we don't get as many clues to base speculation on, especially if you define canon narrowly. We know from the first chapter of The Hunger Games that there are about eight thousand people in District Twelve. Katniss tells us that the Capitol is a city, and speaks about Eleven being a large district, speaking in front of crowds, etc., but doesn't provide any other numbers. In chapter 15 of Mockingjay, Beetee says he's been 'playing with numbers' and believes death toll of the rebellion may put Panem in danger of killing themselves off. While that's not as helpful as an actual number, I think it implies that the total population of Panem is near to a threshold of a human version of minimum viable population, or at least, a minimum viable population for maintaining Panem's current level of technology (since there's a significant difference in the number of humans required to maintain a basic, subsistence farming-based society and what we think of as a 'modern' society).

click for speculation )
penfold_x: (district 3)
[livejournal.com profile] lorataprose sent me a link to a fan's sorting of the Hunger Games characters into the Hogwarts houses. She didn't like a lot of the author's picks, and I definitely agreed (Gale as a Slytherin? The man who turned down his One True Love's offer to run off into the woods in order to fight a seemingly hopeless battle for justice? Just because you don't like a character doesn't mean s/he is a Slytherin). That said, I tried to do better myself, but found to be challenging. What do you think?

Gryffindor
Katniss: Sometimes I have difficulty 'getting' Katniss (we meet her when she already has a mild case of PTSD, which only gets worse as the books go on, so she's unreliable, even about herself), but I think she's predominantly Gryffindor. She's very brave and daring (most people in Twelve don't dare to go beyond the fence, but she does it routinely from a young age, and if we trust her POV, she's the only or one of an extremely small number of non-Career volunteers). She's independent (doesn't need anyone to sit by her at school, is able to take on being head of her house at a very young age). She wears her heart on her sleeve ("Everyone knows my secrets before I do") and can get passionate when she feels something is the 'right' thing to do (eg, keeping Peeta out of/alive during the 75th). She's driven by her emotions a lot of the time, to the point she takes risks that others might think foolish (the shot at the Gamemakers, the play with the berries, walking out into the square in Two to try to make peace). Her protective nature (eg, toward Rue) could be interpreted as a chivalrous streak. She's loyal to her friends, expects loyalty in return from them, and heaven help you if you break faith with her, even for a good reason (eg, Mrs. Everdeen). And, well, she's not evinced any love of learning and she isn't terribly cunning.

Gale: I think this is really clear. Gale is brave, to the point of recklessness sometimes. Gale keenly feels the injustice of their world and has always wanted to do something about it, and is only held back by the need to take care of his immediate family. Like Katniss, he's brave enough to hunt in the woods when most of Twelve won't walk out past the meadow. When Gale shouts during the planning of the assault on the Nut that he'd gladly give his life if he were a spy, Katniss says she has no doubt he's being honest. But Gale probably couldn't be a spy because, like Katniss, everyone knows exactly what he's thinking all the time.

Cinna: Idealism. A seemingly inborn sense of justice. Courage to take certain stands, even though he knows he will likely die for them. He's clever about it, so he may have some snake or claw in him (especially given his creativity, which speaks to both those houses), but I think, overall, given his ability to tap into and bring out a sense of nobility, he's predominantly Gryffindor.

Johanna: I'm less sure about this sort. A girl who wins her games by pretending to be a frightened weakling sounds Slytherin-ish, but her cunning seems to have left her by the time we meet her in Catching Fire, where she's pretty blunt and brutal with everyone (her interview in the movie, in particular, is classic Gryffindor). It's implied that she's lost all of her family, probably as the result of resisting Snow on some point of principle. In Mockingjay, she's relentless (and very brave) about pushing herself to try to get over fears. Though she's burnt out and battered when we meet her, I think there's a hero under the damage.

Ravenclaw
Wiress: Almost stereotypically Raveclaw--the absent-minded professor, so lost in her own thoughts that she sometimes trails off in the middle of her sentences. Loves learning and is extremely creative.

Beetee: Very much like Wiress, but you could make an argument that there's a lot of cunning in a teenager who created what must have been a meticulous and deliberate trap that killed six tributes simultaneously. However, Beetee also seems to be perfectly happy to be off stage; he's got a central role in much of the work of the rebellion, but never evidences any desire to be the one calling the shots or to move himself into a political position in the new government. He may have a streak of Slytherin in his make-up (it's definitely part of my headcanon for him), but he seems to be mostly driven by his intellect and curiosity.

Plutarch: For all they're about a revolution, there isn't a lot of political theory in Collins' books. Plutarch comes closer than any other character to seeming to have some sense of the abstract concepts beyond 'I'm rebelling because the Capitol is starving/working me to death.' He also seems to be very cerebral (especially in the movie presentation), and for all his understanding of human emotion, can appear to not care as much as he should, or not have so much of a sense of the human cost of the rebellion.

Annie: This is something of a WAG, since we don't get to know Annie very well, but when [livejournal.com profile] lorataprose and I were talking about this many moons ago, we both had the sense that she belonged in Ravenclaw. It could be the way she seems to live primarily in her head, coupled with her quiet demeanor. I get the impression that, for all she's a career, Annie's reaction to her districtmate's beheading was partly due to her being less ready than a more practically oriented career would be for the reality of violence.

Hufflepuff
Prim: Animal-loving healer. Gentle, friendly, desiring to help others. Practical (e.g., in the Catching Fire film, takes over from Mrs. Everdeen when her hands are shaking too much to get the morphling into the syringe).

Brutus: There isn't a lot to work with in canon, but I think there are two types of kids who go into a career program: reckless daredevils (Clove) and true believers (Cato). If Enobaria is the daredevil of the 75th pairing, Brutus is the true-believing workhorse. Brutus isn't flamboyant (especially in the movie presentation). He's there to do the job that needs doing.

Mags: We don't get an awful lot about Mags in canon, so I may be overly influenced by fanon here, but I get the sense she's very community-oriented (she volunteers for Annie, probably thinking that it's worth sacrificing herself for someone who still has her whole life ahead of her) and practical (she does what she can in the arena to help out, plugging away steadily at what she can do instead of getting frustrated/emotional).

Peeta: I'm not 100% sold on any house for Peeta. As a sixteen year old, he decided that he loved a girl he almost never spoke to so much he was willing to die for her. I'm not sure if that's anything other than crazy, but maybe it's Hufflepuff? He's also warm, friendly, and likable. He seems to have a good sense of what works with a group. He's comfortable being the supporting player; he doesn't seem to have any desire to be the star.

Slytherin
Haymitch: It takes a lot of skill to be as impaired as Haymitch is (no doubt he's a genuine alcoholic) and still plot a revolution. He's great at determining what arena strategies are best for Katniss and Peeta, and even talks Seneca Crane into bending the rules to allow for a dual-victor scenario. Haymitch is more loyal to the plan/system then to individuals, but he does know how to strike alliances to protect himself and those he's taken on as his.

Finnick: A 14-year-old Career tribute? Ambitious. Certainly thought he was destined for greatness. More than his clever, showy arena strategy (where the others didn't realize 'he was the one to beat until it was too late'), I think his successful career as a spy points to Finnick as a snake. He's the anti-Katniss, able to conceal his true motives and use his beguiling charm to get Capitol citizens to reveal to him the dirtiest of laundry.

Rue: "Where's Peeta?" "Oh, he's down by the river..." Rue is one clever girl, using her size and her abilities well to her advantage in the arena. But her biggest triumph is making her alliance with Katniss, which might well have saved her (she could probably guess that Katniss would think of her as a substitute Prim and have a great deal of difficulty killing her, if it came down to it). She makes it oblivious to Katniss that she'd be a valuable teammate (with the trackerjackers and the leaves), and is cunning enough to neglect to mention to Katniss the one fact that might have caused her to pull away from Rue to go be with Peeta (who's down by the river alright, bleeding to death). And, if you take the movies for canon, during training, she stole a favorite knife from the biggest threat in the tribute pool, just to watch what he'd do (and enjoy how it played out).
penfold_x: (district 3)
I'm perfectly happy to watch a million seasons of The Walking Dead, provided Daryl is in them.
penfold_x: (district 3)

Just when I think I'm teetering on the edge of too creepy and gross, someone shows me how it's really done:

Of course, great software architects and bioengineering minds don’t just develop overnight. That’s why the District’s intense focus on technical education must begin very early on. Just before the age of 3, all District 3 youth are tested and ranked by their abilities for appropriate placement within the school system. The advanced placement children are then appropriated through an annual “district roundup,” where they are freed from the natural constraints and intellectual limitations of a family setting by living and training at a state-of-the-art educational facility managed by the Panem Advanced Technical Training system, or PATT. Here the very best minds are trained to build a bright future for the nation and share a lifetime comradery in achievement and service.

penfold_x: (district 3)
Was just about to post a comment to [livejournal.com profile] kawuli's great post on District 9, which is chock full of details about modern agriculture and her headcanon, when I realized that I had a long digression that I should probably put somewhere I can find again.

[livejournal.com profile] kawuli noted, "Which means that District 9 probably has a few scattered crop-production centers with something like 10 people responsible for growing hundreds of square miles/kilometers of row crops, probably with zones for various (rotations of) cereals/legume field crops and some seed-production and research areas (with visiting scientists/geneticists from 3)." I definitely agree with the idea that there are some scientists from Three who get to travel occasionally as a part of their work, and think this can actually have some funny wrinkles in culture among D3's scientist class.

In my hc, I figure that all higher education in Panem takes place at the University of Panem, because all other colleges and universities were subsumed into the state university or shut down when the Capitol came to power, in the aftermath of the Dark Days, if not before. The UofP has satellite campuses around the Capitol and in certain of the inner districts. All students in Three identified in testing the 'alpha' strata (generally, the top 2-3%) are tracked for training at the Three campus of the UofP (commonly referred to as the National Science Academy).

I figure that, like a lot of the industries we see in Panem, STEM research and manufacture are controlled by the Capitol. They pick which firms get contracts (probably with plenty of within-Capitol graft), what to manufacture, and what areas of research (pure and practical) should be funded. There's very little independent industry left in Three (the Capitol can't risk Three becoming an economic power in its own right).

Because of these limitations there's limited opportunity for even the best and brightest, so when you show up for your first day at the academy, your classmates are also your competition for the plum firms and assignments. I think, to the degree that a student wants to see what lies beyond Three's fenced-in city, the student should think carefully about what specialty s/he wants to try for. Some of this is out of the student's control; there are a certain number of geopetrolium engineers that are going to be needed, and it doesn't matter that you don't want to be sent to freeze your *#$% off in Five for a few weeks in the dead of winter. But working hard to be at the top of your class in, say, computer engineering, lessens the likelihood of that happening.

As with a lot of other things in Panem, I think the Capitol privileges control over efficiency in the matter of Threes working outside of their district, and so visits are probably much less frequent than they should be, which ends up with a lot of frustrated scientists and engineers not being allowed to know all of the context of a problem that they're working on, as well as frustrated factory workers, miners, etc. who have to make do with what arrives from Three, even if it's not optimally suited to their needs, or wasn't sufficiently empirically tested before it was deployed. There are also security issues with travel, so scientists whose rebellious leanings are exposed, or have family members who commit serious offenses are not going to be allowed to travel at all.

cross training, it's not just for jocks )
penfold_x: (district 3)
So you know, D2, for Eibhlin, every household is a deadly weapon.

ETA: Eibhlin says keep your cabinet current. She can't blow up anything with hydrogen peroxide that's reverted to water.
penfold_x: (nerd (wesley))
I recently read Marie Kondo's The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up. I've been searching for a while for a way to improve my habitat, so that my space is relaxing, joyful and pleasant. Kondo seems to get exactly that concept, and her position on organizing is forget finding new and more elaborate ways to store--radically pare down what you have, so that it is much easier to store in your space.

I think that she's right. I'm surrounded by entirely too much stuff (a problem I've been failing to deal with for a while now). I started with clothes, as she recommends (pictures and details to come), and that was difficult but not impossible, and I saw a lot of benefits (oh my goodness, I want to tell you about my sock drawer!).

The next category she recommends you organize (yes, there's an order of categories, and then orders within categories) is books. I've got a lot of books and magazines; I'm a news junkie and one of my hobbies is politics and sociology. There's also the obvious cross-over with fannish stuff: book series, tie-ins for movies and television series, comics and graphic novels, and fanzines. I'm not going to even try to deal with fannishly produced books and manga while working the 'books' category; for me, I think they fall mostly in the hobbies category, which would normally be dealt with later in the process.

Even though I can make the space, I don't want to keep everything. My free time is a precious commodity, and I think I should be realistic about what I'd be likely to re-read (or read for the first time). But even with that knowledge, it's hard to cut down what I have, and I'd appreciate feedback/ideas. What general level should I be using to cut down to? Does it matter that reading so closely aligns with my other hobbies/interests?

My books fall roughly into the following categories:

* Textbooks: law, politics, psychology, history, French. I'm thinking toss the law books, as they're not useful for re-study (because of the way law is taught, wherein cases are presented for discussion rather than presentation of rules/principles). For a practitioner, they're useless. Hornbooks and nutshells are more useful, but I've tossed those as they've aged (because the ones I was using were becoming OBE). I'm also inclined to toss the politics textbooks, as they're all from the mid-nineties and none of them are classics in the field (someone's incorrect guess about what they post-cold war world would look like isn't really worth saving, right?). The history books aren't particularly good either, and I think I can find anything I need on the Internet. The French I'm keeping because I have used them a few times since graduating, and I plan to use them again to brush up before any travels to French-speaking countries. The psychology are a hard spot: what if I want to look up information on child development, abnormal psych, etc, for a fanfic? I haven't really used them post-undergrad, but I can't shake the feeling that I might.

* Professional materials: law journals, books/pamphlets/briefs published as a part of prior jobs, papers published by others in my specialty. The law journals... I'm not sure why I saved them, except that I guess when I finished school that's what I thought lawyers did. Some of the recent ones I might find an article or two of interest in, but the others... If I haven't read them now, I'm not going to pick them up in my free time now. And if I really need an article from a journal from fifteen years ago, I've got my Westlaw account. Briefs, articles, and other materials I authored however... I think those need to be archived some where. Most of it I'm not going to use as a writing sample, but I do want copies of things that I wrote, and for me most of that doesn't live digitally. There's also one very big professional topic that I worked intensely on for years where, even though I don't know if I'll ever write that journal article I was planning, I think I need all the materials that I have from that issue because it's a huge career thing that may become relevant in my life again at some point (either to teach or write about, or just to remember), though I think I should move it off of the book shelves and into storage boxes.

* Sociology and political philosophy. I'm perpetually interested in what makes human societies (especially the US) function. I'm constantly reading new texts and, even though I rarely re-read books, I sometimes go back to extract factoids or compare with something new I'm reading. Keep 'em all?

* Political biography. Keep everything that wasn't disappointing, and anything I haven't read yet that still looks interesting (I think I have a high chance of picking any one of these up as a random 'oooh, let's start a new book' choice).

* Religious: Bible studies, apologetics, popular topics. Keep apologetics and popular topics; like sociology and political philosophy, I think I use them enough as reference that they're still good to keep around. Toss Bible studies (they should be like a course--you take it once, then it's done). Cull the C.S. Lewis for duplicates, and keep only the best copy of a given work.

* Cookbooks. So many gifts I don't use! Toss everything but the three I do use, as I can find almost anything I need on the Internet.

* Mainstream popular novels (eg, spy novels, drama, chick lit). OMG TOSS THEM. None of these are passions, and they're so easy to buy another of if I need them, for some unforseen reason. Keeping these are like keeping wrappers from my candy bars. I feel a little twinge getting rid of my Tom Clancy novels--when I was in school, he was one of my favorites; I read his whole back catalogue, and eagerly anticipated anything in the Jack Ryan/John Clark universe. But I haven't re-read them in over a decade, and it's not as though I wouldn't be able to find replacement copies if I had a burning need. I also feel just a little off about tossing my Stephen Fry novels but, like Clancy, if I'm jonsing to re-read, it shouldn't be an issue to find them again.

* Science fiction and fantasy novels. Keep the ones I love, but get good copies. For example, why are my half of my Harry Potters beat-up paperbacks with cracked spines? Keep the ones I haven't read yet but feel I am likely to read, regardless of the condition. Donate books I read and enjoyed but won't read again (or didn't read and don't particularly feel likely to); if it's not a passion, what do I need the copy for?

* Random classics. Sure, I enjoyed these books, but... who needs single Shakespearean play lying around? If Shakespeare or Austen were passions, then sure, I should get good copies of all their works and keep them, but the honest truth is there's a good reason why I wasn't an English major. Same goes for my books of Keats and Frost poetry. I read and enjoyed, but I don't go out on beautiful summer afternoons to re-read them under a tree in the dappled sunlight. I'm not a poetry buff, and keeping them around doesn't make me smarter or more sophisticated.

* Art, museum, coffee table. Mostly souvenirs from travel or gifts. The photos are generally lovely, but I don't display them as coffee table books. Really hard to part with, though, as I remember how much they cost, or the friends who gave them to me.

* Reference. Most of these are travel books, which I would purge except they also feel sort of like souvenirs? I also have some books on purchasing a home that I'd like to keep until such time as I actually do that (!) and a few books on nutrition that I think might be helpful in the future. And that copy of the Army handbook on nuclear, biological and radiological threats just seems like the sort of thing it would be bad luck to throw away.

* Magazines. I don't keep news magazines any more (I used to have soooo maaaaany). Right now, my only non-fannish magazines are my decades-old issues of Victoria magazine. At one time, this was the aesthetic to which I aspired. I couldn't get rid of them when I tossed the news magazines because I was still thinking about all the recipes, photos, etc. Theoretically, I could still use them as design inspiration, but I think the look is slightly more fussy than what would please me today.

* Fannish tie-in materials. Oh Lord, so many books in this category. I think I'm going to treat this as a separate, hobby category and do them when we get to the hobbies area. *head in hands*
penfold_x: (district 3)
Going through my books, trying to declutter--picking them up one by one, and placing them into piles for save, discard, donate. Was just about to post if someone wanted a copy of [redacted fannish title] when I remembered, the ending of that book sucks.

Just wanted you to know, peeps, I'm looking out for you.
penfold_x: (district 3)
I'm up near National Cathedral today, and noticed this restaurant (nope, no photoshop involved).
penfold_x: (bookgeek (seven))
Hard copies of books should be bundled with a digital version. I would pay a $3-7 premium for this service (depending on the size of the book).
penfold_x: (jelly babies to manual)
Stock up on Toblerlones and find your paramount hat: the first part of the series finale of Cabin Pressure airs today at 6:30pm GMT on Radio 4, with part two airing same time tomorrow.
penfold_x: (Default)
I love thinking about the mechanics of the Hunger Games universe. Even before I was making up stories in my head about my favorite characters, I was intrigued by the puzzle of how this post-apocalyptic society functions. I've devoured all the metas I can find, and my reading preferences tend strongly toward the elaborate world-builders of the fandom.

Until recently, my favorite Panem map was Vanja1995’s (scroll down for some excellent reasoning for his district location choices). My few quibbles with his choices were that I located the Capitol in Denver, flipped the locations of Nine and Ten, flipped the locations of Two and Five, had Four a little closer to Louisiana, and figured the size of One and Three to be much smaller.

[livejournal.com profile] fernwithy's excellent essay and map have changed my mind on a number of points. I strongly recommend reading her essay, as she's noticed a number of points in the books that I think almost conclusively pinpoint the Capitol and Thirteen which, in turn, provide some strong hints about where several of the other districts are located.

original fernwithy larger

Fernwithy's Map

The Capitol )

Districts Twelve and Thirteen )

Districts Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten )

I also concur with her theory that, like Twelve, the urban districts are probably small, fenced in cities, and surrounded by a wilderness that the citizens are not allowed to enter. If the population of Panem is as low as Beetee suggests at the end of Mockingjay, it makes sense to concentrate the population where possible, in order to conserve resources such as power and gas. From the Capitol's perspective, it also makes the urban districts, which probably have a higher population and access to greater technology/potential weapons, easier for Peacekeepers to 'secure'. I think this 'security' is implemented not just to keep the workers from running off and trying to make it in the wilderness, but keep the urban districts from developing the natural resources around them. The more the Capitol controls access to crucial goods like power and food, the greater leverage the Capitol has to quell any attempts at rebellion, and ensure the urban districts cannot develop into economic rivals to the Capitol.

That said, there are a few areas where I have some different theories:

fernwith altered2
Penfold's version of Fernwithy's Map


District Three: I've got a massive amount of headcanon about this district. Although I agree that some of the districts are colonies created by the Capitol sending segments of its population (including refugees from around the world who sought more habitable land after the cataclysms and resulting wars, as [livejournal.com profile] fernwithy writes), I think several of the districts started as independent organizations of survivors (including some refugees) who were later absorbed by the Capitol, either through what was intended to be a mutual protection pact that devolved into a colonial-type relationship, or were forcibly annexed. I like this idea because I think it gives the districts a longer period of time in which to develop their distinctive cultures and genetic 'looks'.1 I also think it's likely that survivors of the cataclysims and wars would concentrate in a few locations, rather than just one or two, because of how difficult it probably was to travel after what appears to have been a severe technological crash, and how relatively dispersed the population of the US is. Generally, I think the cities are better locations for survivor city-states, so, in my headcanon, Three, Six, and Thirteen were independent political entities before or concurrent with the founding of Panem.2

Regarding location, I don't think we get any real hints in canon, apart from the numbering of the districts, as to where they may be located, and the numbering may signify the order in which the districts were added to Panem, rather than their relative distance to the Capitol. Some areas are eliminated just because the canon hints seem to put another district there, but that still leaves a lot of empty space.

In this space, I chose Phoenix. It's the sixth largest US city by population; most of the top ten are either under water or beyond Twelve. Three doesn't have to be a very big city, but I think it helps if both the research and manufacture of almost all technology occurs there. Larger cities are also more likely to have some redundant systems that would help keep or get them running. I also like Phoenix because aerospace and technology are its major industries; if Silicon Valley is underwater, Phoenix might be your next best choice for that type of expertise. It's also got plenty of sunshine and nearby large, empty areas to put solar and wind farms (at least until the Capitol rips them out). And Phoenix is still close to Salt Lake City (at least as compared with Six, Seven, Eight, etc).

District Four: Don't have any real disagreement here just a couple of slight quibbles. First, I extended the district boundary back to encompass more land (and pushed Ten back to maintain a no-mans-land), in part to provide more room for canning/other processing or preservation and shipping facilities, and in part to make the district more comfortable. As Four seems to be on more positive terms with the Capitol than the non-career district, I think the Capitol might give them more space to expand and live comfortably, perhaps even to do some local farming. I also wanted to expand the living area in Four a little closer to Louisiana; all of the characters we meet from Four have Irish-sounding names, and New Orleans is the closest area that once had a large Irish population that I know of.3

District Five: I like [livejournal.com profile] fernwithy's placement of Five at Yellowstone, given the natural resources available, however, given the Capitol's choice to concentrate power generation in a single district, I think they'd be better off if Five is structured like the other natural resource districts, with a capital and multiple smaller settlements. I spread the boundaries out to encompass large parts of Wyoming and the Dakotas, in order to capture existing hydro facilities on the Missouri River, existing wind farms in each of these states, the shale oil in North Dakota, and plenty of open land where more wind and solar facilities could be built.

District Six: As [livejournal.com profile] fernwithy notes, we don't get any textual clues. I like Omaha, for practical and sentimental reasons. Omaha is pretty much in the middle of this vision of Panem, and would be a good location for bringing in goods from Four, Eight, Nine and Ten. Omaha was also the center of the First Continental Railroad, and in the Nineteenth Century, every major railroad served Omaha because of the Omaha Stockyards. It's still Union Pacific's headquarters. If the US has a railroad city, I think Omaha is it.

Of course, this is all just guesswork, but I love trying to work it out. Major thanks to [livejournal.com profile] fernwithy, who upended my thinking about the location of the Capitol and Thirtieth, consequently rearranging my speculation about most of the other districts. If you haven't read her Hunger Games fan fiction, I highly recommend it.

1 Though, of course, no one knows how long Panem existed before the Dark Days, so if you postulate a very long period of time, you could reach the same result that way.
2 But not Eight, because it is so bugnuts cold in Minneapolis (colder than Toronto!), and because of its relatively low population density.
3 Or the Capitol settled a bunch of Irish refugees there and the names have nothing to do with Four's location.
penfold_x: (tivo)
Must-Squee TV
NCIS (September 23, CBS, Tue@8)
Person of Interest (September 23, CBS, Tue@10)
Sleepy Hollow (September 22, FOX, Mon@9)

Also Recording
Agents of SHIELD (September 23, Tues@10)
Reign (October 2, CW, Thurs@9)
Sons of Anarchy (September 9, FX, Tue@10)
Supernatural (October 7, CW, Tues@9)
The Walking Dead (October 12, AMC, Sun@9)
The 100 (October 22, CW, Thurs@9)

Auditioning
Ascension (November 24, SciFi, Mon@9)
Constantine (October 24, NBC, Fri@10)
Gotham (September 22, FOX, Mon@8)
Scorpion (September 22, CBS, Mon@9)
Z Nation (September 12, SciFi, Fri@10)

On the Bubble
Bones (September 25, FOX, Thurs@8)
Elementary (October 30, CBS, Thurs@10)
NCIS:LA (September 29, CBS, Mon@10)


Over the summer, both of my DVRs went to silicon heaven. It was a bit sad (Old Reliable, my first DVR, had been with me since I bought him refurbished in 2002), but also somewhat liberating. For some time now, I've been recording more television than I really want to watch. My new hobbies leave me with less time, and some shows I used to enjoy just aren't as good as they used to be. I end up with stacks of unwatched episodes on my DVR that make me feel a little guilty each time I pass them over. It's hard to cut ties with old favorites, especially, because I still care about the characters, even if the writers have muddled them almost beyond recognition. Having to program in season passes for each series I watch has helped me cut the cord with some old favorites I just don't enjoy as much any more (Castle, Hawaii 5-0) and some programs that were OK for what they were, but not good enough to justify putting the time into (Big Bang Theory, Blue Bloods). I'm close to dropping Bones, NCIS:LA, and Elementary for the same reasons.

Apart from the return of my must-squees and the final resolution of Sons, I'm not terribly excited over the new season. I'm trying Constantine, Z Nation, and Gotham simply because I feel like I owe genre shows a chance. Scorpion's on my list because, as you've undoubtedly noticed, I'm hella weak for CBS procedurals. Ascension , however, has a fascinating idea at the core -- and Tricia Helfer. Of course, these things are all in the execution, but I think we've got legitimate reason to hope for more than Mad Men in space.
penfold_x: (district 3)


Title: Predator
Characters: Claudius, Eibhlin, Lyme (Gen)
Rating: PG-13
Warnings: Violent imagery, a wee bit of foul language
Summary: Claudius doesn't know if he was born a killer or just trained to it, but he has no doubt what he is.
A/N: The ficlet is set in the chemistry 'verse, and as such cribs extensively from the work of [livejournal.com profile] lorataprose, especially Fixed to a Star and the forthcoming Divergence, Part II. No actions, thoughts, or other elements of this story are binding on [livejournal.com profile] lorataprose's 'verse.

predator )
penfold_x: (district 3)
At MediaWest this year, there was a vendor making metal bookmarks on site. I took a look at the photos she had brought, but none of the fandoms caught my eye. [livejournal.com profile] myfieldnotes must have asked her to create a Hunger Games version just for me:

image_2
image_3


Meanwhile, [livejournal.com profile] mrwubbles sent me Lego's amazingly detailed contribution to the thirtieth anniversary of Ghostbusters:


image_1

Profile

penfold_x: (Default)
penfold_x

October 2017

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 08:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios